Concerns raised by Judge Cheryl Allen about Proposed PA Legislation
In a recent video interview, a former Pennsylvania court judge, Judge Cheryl Allen, expressed grave concerns regarding several proposed bills (House Bill 1024, House Bill 1025, House Bill 1026, and House Bill 1027) that she believes pose a significant threat to individual rights and the integrity of the criminal justice system. As a seasoned legal professional with extensive experience in criminal law, her analysis sheds light on the potential dangers of these legislative measures.
According to the judge, the proposed PA legislation has the potential to weaponize the criminal court system, leading to the complete ruin of individuals’ lives and the erosion of civil liberties. The judge draws attention to a hypothetical scenario involving a concerned parent expressing their objections to sexually explicit books in school libraries during a school board meeting. If this parent refuses to leave after being told to do so and is subsequently charged with criminal trespass, the consequences could be severe.
Under the proposed bills, the parent’s charge of criminal trespass, a first-degree misdemeanor, could be upgraded to a third-degree felony if their actions and language are deemed as hate-motivated intimidation. This upgraded charge carries a maximum prison sentence of three and a half to seven years. Moreover, upon conviction, the parent would be required to undergo eight hours of sensitivity training and eight hours of community service to the offended community, as conditions of their probation or parole.
The judge raises concerns about the potential for abuse within this system. If individuals fail to complete the community service or education requirements, they could be deemed in violation of their probation or parole, resulting in further incarceration or punishment. Furthermore, any subsequent hate crime or hate speech charge could lead to the revocation of their probation or parole, subjecting them to even harsher penalties as repeat offenders.
The consequences of being convicted of a hate crime extend beyond the immediate sentence. Individuals may face lifelong ramifications, such as difficulties securing employment, particularly in fields involving children, healthcare, or positions that require public interaction. With a criminal record that is unlikely to be expunged, these individuals may find themselves permanently stigmatized and unable to fully participate in society.
The judge highlights an example involving a 12-year-old boy who wore a t-shirt expressing his beliefs about gender to school. This innocent act was considered hate speech, leading to demands that he remove the t-shirt permanently. Judge Allen foresees a situation where an adult wearing a similar t-shirt could be charged with criminal trespass if they refuse to leave a specific location.
The judge argues that such legislation allows for ideological prosecutions, where subjective beliefs rather than actual criminal actions determine the legal consequences. This approach raises concerns about the erosion of freedom of expression and the potential abuse of power by district attorneys. By criminalizing certain forms of speech or expressing different viewpoints, innocent individuals with no prior criminal record could find themselves facing felony charges and being effectively “canceled” from society.
She concludes by emphasizing the inherent dangers and opportunities for abuse present in the proposed legislation. Judge Allen highlights the potential for innocent lives to be ruined, arguing that these bills threaten not only freedom of expression but also due process and the principles upon which our constitutional rights are based.
Thanks for reading. You can watch the interview with Judge Cheryl Allen below.
this issue. Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
If you are interested in learning more about the proposed PA legislation and the concerns raised by Judge Cheryl Allen, we recommend checking out some of the following resources:
- A recently published op-ed by Judge Allen which discusses the constitutional implications of the proposed PA legislation: Proposed PA Legislation Raises Constitutional Concerns Over Free Speech and Due Process
- The full text of House Bill 1024, as well as its companion bills, House Bill 1025, House Bill 1026, and House Bill 1027: PA General Assembly website
We hope that these resources help you gain a better understanding of